Listen To WPR online Live Streaming Page Archive Streaming Page Click here to support WPR! Return to the WPR Home Page
Explore WPR
WPR Home
Support WPR!
Support WPR's Online Community!
Contact Us
About WPR
Newsletters and Reports
Studios, Stations and Program Schedules
Station Coverage Maps, Reception and Technical Issues
WPR Program Index
The Ideas Network
The NPR News and Classical Network
WPR News
Internet Webcasting
WPR's National SHows
The Radio Store
Related Links

WPR Programs
Search wpr.org
This Month's Featured Stories
NEWS LINKS: WPR News Home | Bureaus | Reporters | Awards
FEATURES: Specials, Series & Documentaries | Wisconsin Vote | Wisconsin Life | StoryCorps
INCUMBENT JUDGE ROGGENSACK VOWS TO RESOLVE PROSSER ETHICS CHARGE
WPR News - Incumbent Judge Roggensack Vows To Resolve Prosser Ethics Charge
Tuesday February 12, 2013 by Gilman Halsted
(Photo by WisPolitics.com (CC-BY-SA))
Enlarge

The incumbent in the spring election for the state supreme court is touting her 17 years of experience on the bench as the primary reason voters should re-elect her. But the most specific promise Justice Patience Roggensack is making to voters is that she will once and for all resolve the outstanding ethics charge against fellow Justice David Prosser.

Bringing an end to the frequent squabbling among justices has become a central issue in in the campaign. Roggensack is promising to convince her fellow Justices to end the 18 months of legal limbo surrounding an ethics charge against Justice Prosser: "We could do it: we could do it."

The judicial council says Prosser broke the rules when he put his hands around Justice Anne Walsh Bradley's neck in her office during an argument about the court's ruling upholding the controversial collective bargaining law two years ago in June. Roggensack says despite the fact that all but one of the justices witnessed the incident, the court can agree to officially resolve the case one way or another and show the public the court can discipline its own members. "And I am hopeful we will do something from the bench in a very public way."

Roggensack has served one ten-year term on the high court and seven years before that as an appeals court judge. She says that means she's better positioned both to clear up this ethics case and more qualified as a judge than either of her two opponents.

"And the job is judging whether another judge got it right, it's also judging whether another judge got it right in pretty much every substantive area of law. My colleagues ... oops, I mean my opponents, don't have that breadth of substantive law experience and they have zero judicial experience."

Both of her opponents are practicing lawyers who have not served as judges. Roggensack says she rejects the labels 'conservative' or 'activist' when applied to judges and says she rules on each case based on the facts and the constitution.

We'll have stories profiling Justice Roggensacks's opponents — Vince Megna and Ed Fallone, Wednesday and Thursday.

You can also listen to this story or download it now! (1:30)



Support for WPR provided by

Shop Now!



Support WPR!


HOME | ABOUT | PROGRAM INDEX | MEMBERSHIP | SPONSORSHIPS | WPR NEWS
IDEAS NETWORK | NEWS & CLASSICAL NETWORK | RADIO STORE
LIVE STREAMS | AUDIO ARCHIVES

For questions or comments about our programming, call Audience Services
at 1-800-747-7444, email us at listener@wpr.org, or use our Online Feedback Form.
View our Privacy Policy.   Send comments about our website to webmaster@wpr.org.

©2013 by Wisconsin Public Radio - a service of the
Wisconsin Educational Communications Board
and University of Wisconsin - Extension.