As many Wisconsinites know, not all farmers’ markets are the same, but they are found in all types of communities — cities, small towns, suburbs and rural areas. With differences in size, rules and management styles, many of these markets offer unique features and face diverse challenges in providing localized access to fresh foods and other products.
Farmers’ market managers in Wisconsin, along with other people who support farmers’ markets, expressed interest in learning more about what practices and features are common across the state. Researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Extension and the UW-Madison College of Agricultural & Life Sciences conducted a survey in 2017 to help answer their questions. It was based on self-reported data — primarily provided by market managers — about their practices and markets’ characteristics.
Stay informed on the latest news
Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.
Urban shoppers can expect larger markets, with an average of 68 vendors. Markets in suburban areas host an average of 48 vendors during peak season. In small towns, markets tend to be smaller, with around 25 vendors, slightly more than the average of 21 vendors operating at rural markets.
Regardless of size, farmers’ markets offer an important venue for farmers to participate in their local economies (like a youth entrepreneurship program in Brown County), with 88 percent of markets reporting sales of locally produced products. By comparison, just 16 percent said they also sell non-local products. Only half of the responding markets had prepared food vendors, which may point towards a potential avenue for growth.
Although 86 percent of markets offer free parking, other means of access may be limited, making convenient transportation a potential barrier to market patronage. Fewer than half of markets are adjacent to a bus stop or offer bicycle racks. Despite this concern, research suggests that low-income Wisconsin residents generally don’t perceive market locations and hours as inconvenient.
Wisconsinites who utilize food assistance programs may find inconsistent applicability; 65 percent of markets accept Women, Infants and Children Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program benefits, and 42 percent accept electronic benefit transfer cards, which allow people to access benefits from the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Low SNAP participation may be explained in part by other research focused on Wisconsin farmers’ market managers, which found that accepting EBT or SNAP benefits can be labor intensive and expensive.
Many markets, many variations
Most farmers’ markets in Wisconsin are independent operations, leading to a wide variety of rules, funding sources and product types. Forty percent of markets operate as their own entity, and another 28 percent are run by a parent organization that does not operate another market. Local governments and business associations each run around 13 percent of markets, and organizations with multiple markets account for 4 percent. Around 6 percent of respondents didn’t provide details on their markets’ operations.
The administrative split between standalone markets and those that have the support or resources of a larger affiliate organization structure has a strong impact on funding and other resources. Most markets that are not run by a city or other local government do not receive substantial support from those entities.
Product guidelines and other rules, as well as their enforcement procedures, also vary by market. Sixty-nine percent of markets reported enforcing some rules related to where products were grown, how products were grown, or if reselling is allowed, among others. Fifteen percent have rules that are unenforced, and only 6 percent have no rules for vendor practices. Ten percent didn’t specify product or vendor rules.
Managers are involved in decision-making at most markets, with vendors providing direction at around a third, and customers weighing in at 4 percent of responding markets. Around half of all markets have boards of directors, but these are more prevalent among large markets, with 62 percent utilize this structure compared to 42 percent of small markets.
An objective of this survey was to provide clarity to market managers about common practices across the state. Another goal was to help UW-Extension and partners better help farmers’ markets sustain themselves, as they provide communities a variety of economic, social and health benefits. Understanding the nature of Wisconsin’s farmers’ markets is a step in this direction.
Editor’s Note: Laura Witzling is a Ph.D. graduate of the Department of Life Sciences Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Bret Shaw is an environmental communication specialist at UW Cooperative Extension and an associate professor in the Department of Life Sciences Communication at UW-Madison. Marlie Wilson is a graduate of UW-Madison with a joint degree in Agroecology and Urban & Regional Planning. Alfonso Morales is a specialist at UW Cooperative Extension and associate professor in the Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture at UW-Madison.
Wisconsin’s Farmers’ Markets Come In Many Sizes And Structures was originally published on WisContext which produced the article in a partnership between Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension.
This report was produced in a partnership between Wisconsin Public Radio, PBS Wisconsin and the University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension. @ Copyright 2024, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.