A group representing Wisconsin doctors is against a bill requiring ultrasounds before an abortion.
Supporters of the proposed requirement say it may prompt the woman to change her mind.
A handful of abortion-related bills have recently been introduced and are making their way through committees. A Senate bill authored by Mary Lazich, R-New Berlin, requires ultrasounds before abortions. Under Lazich’s bill, a woman can choose the least invasive type of ultrasound and would not be forced to look.
Stay informed on the latest news
Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.
“During the ultrasound, the physician will display ultrasound images and provide a medical description of the images, including the dimensions of the unborn child and a visualization of the fetal heartbeat.”
A state doctor’s group, the Wisconsin Medical Society (WMS), called the requirement “interference” in the physician-patient relationship. In addition, they object to a provision in the bill requiring that abortions be performed by a doctor with admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles. Dr. Tosha Wetterneck of WMS says most patient care occurs away from a hospital setting:
“Procedures that are performed in free-standing, ambulatory care centers or in clinics around the state. In fact, we have rural places within the state where people are getting care not within 30 miles of a hospital. But yet we single out one procedure to make this a requirement.”
Other pending bills would give religious groups an exemption from providing health insurance which includes contraceptive coverage; another establishes civil liability for sex-selective abortion.
Wisconsin Public Radio, © Copyright 2024, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.